For Christmas I received an interesting gift from a friend - my extremely own "best-selling" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.
Yet it was completely written by AI, with a few basic prompts about me provided by my pal Janet.
It's an intriguing read, and really amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It simulates my chatty style of writing, but it's also a bit repeated, and very verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's prompts in collecting information about me.
Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.
There's also a strange, repeated hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.
There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, because rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language model.
I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can purchase any further copies.
There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anyone's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and created "solely to bring humour and happiness".
Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is intended as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.
He wishes to broaden his variety, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and maybe using an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human customers.
It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.
Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.
"We should be clear, when we are discussing information here, we actually imply human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard developers' rights.
"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."
In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And higgledy-piggledy.xyz despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.
"I do not believe making use of generative AI for creative functions must be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without authorization must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful however let's build it fairly and relatively."
OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for wiki.dulovic.tech their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.
The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use developers' content on the internet to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.
Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".
He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and bphomesteading.com logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.
"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly against removing copyright law for AI.
"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a whole lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The government is undermining among its best carrying out industries on the unclear promise of growth."
A government spokesperson said: "No move will be made until we are absolutely confident we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to assist them license their material, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI designers."
Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide information library containing public information from a large range of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.
In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.
But this has now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.
This comes as a number of suits against AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.
They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.
The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it must be paying for it.
If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.
DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.
As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to check out in parts because it's so verbose.
But provided how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm uncertain the length of time I can remain positive that my substantially slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.
Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.
Outside the UK? Register here.
